Patient Guard

Blogs from Patient Guard

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Embark on a journey of comprehensive insights and updates within the dynamic landscape of the Medical Device and In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) industry through Patient Guard’s cutting-edge blogs. Our commitment extends to providing invaluable content that delves into the intricate realms of Medical Device Regulation and IVD Regulation, with a sharp focus on navigating the regulatory landscapes of the United Kingdom (UK), the European Union (EU), and the United States (US).

At Patient Guard, we are not just a source of information; we are your ultimate partner in understanding and maneuvering through the complexities of Medical Device and IVD regulatory requirements, as well as Quality Assurance. Our blogs serve as a beacon, illuminating the latest updates and insights crucial for professionals and organizations operating in these highly regulated sectors.

To elevate your understanding and empower your knowledge, Patient Guard offers complimentary consultations. Reach out to us today, and discover how our expertise can assist you in achieving compliance for your medical devices and IVD products. Our team is dedicated to providing personalized guidance tailored to your specific needs, ensuring a seamless journey toward regulatory adherence.

In addition to our enlightening blog content, we invite you to explore our enriching YouTube channel and LinkedIn page. Here, industry updates and valuable insights come to life through engaging multimedia formats. Furthermore, our sister website, QMSREGS.com, stands as a comprehensive resource, offering a diverse range of training courses and Medical Device and IVD templates. This integrated approach ensures that your regulatory needs are not only met but exceeded.

Patient Guard is not just a repository of information; we are your ally in navigating the ever-evolving landscape of Medical Device and IVD regulations. Join us on this educational journey, where compliance meets excellence.

Contact us
image of a spy glass looking at graphs of data - image indicates patient guard as a medical device and IVD regulatory and quality assurance consultancy
Blog

The Future of Healing: How AI is Revolutionizing the Medical Device Industry

In the realm of healthcare, artificial intelligence (AI) is not just a buzzword; it’s a transformative force that is reshaping the landscape of medicine and medical technology. Over the past decade, we have witnessed remarkable advancements in AI, and its impact on the medical device industry is nothing short of revolutionary. As we step into the next five years, the synergy between AI and medical devices is poised to usher in a new era of healthcare innovation, efficiency, and patient outcomes.

Read More »
October 19, 2023 11:19 am
Quality in medical devices can be divided into two areas, Quality Assurance and Quality Control in this blog we discuss the difference between the two. This image is used to represent quality, it is a clipboard with checks marks next to boxes with the words approved above it. There is a quality engineer next to it looking at a device and a spy glass over the form. On the other side of the clipboard are some boxes with barcodes on them.
Blog

Quality Assurance & Quality Control

Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) are two important concepts in the medical device industry. Although they are related, there are distinct differences between the two. In this blog post, we will explore the difference between medical device quality assurance and quality control. 

Read More »
May 13, 2023 11:36 am
Blood Pressure Cuff, scissors, syringe, stethoscope placed on a white background - Represents medical devices - image used by patient guard to represent subjects relating to medical device and IVD regulatory affairs and Quality Assurance.
Blog

Medical Device Start-up – is not applying a regulatory strategy early on costing more in the long run?

Starting a medical device company can be a stressful time, what with design and development activities, finding funding, ensuring you don’t run out of capital etc.

One very important area that is often not considered early enough is the regulatory side. Many medical device startup companies think that the regulatory activities don’t begin until the device has been developed and they often don’t realise the cost involved in ensuring that the medical device meets the safety requirements of the medical device regulations globally

Read More »
April 25, 2023 2:30 pm
illustration of people with pencils in their hands writing on a large clipboard with the heading regulations on it - used by patient guard limited to discuss the topic of EU regulations and PRRC under article 15 in relation to medical devices and IVDS.
Blog

Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC) MDR

Part of these new measures is the introduction of a Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC). Article 15 of regulations EU 2017/745 (MDR) and EU 2017/746 (IVDR), the legal requirements for the PRRC are presented.

They state that each manufacturer and authorised representative (if applicable) must have at their disposal a PRRC, who has the necessary requisite qualifications and experience for regulatory compliance.

Read More »
April 14, 2022 8:23 am
This is an illustration of a hand under an x-ray. The hand shows the bones of the hand. This image is used by patient guard to demonstrate an example of a class IIb medical device.
Blog

Medical Device Classification EU

In the EU Medical Devices are categorised into 6 classes, these are Class I, Class Is (sterile), Class Im (measuring), Class IIa, Class IIb and Class III.  

Class I devices are considered to be of low risk, Class II devices as medium risk and Class III devices as high risk. 

Depending on the classification of device determines the regulatory conformity pathway that needs to be taken to gain compliance and allow manufacturers to place product on the EU market. 

Read More »
March 8, 2022 11:32 am
This is an illustration of two contact lenses. This image is used by patient guard to represent an example of class IIa medical devices.
Blog

Medical Devices Classification UK

In the UK Medical Devices are categorised into 6 classes, these are Class I, Class Is (sterile), Class Im (measuring), Class IIa, Class IIb and Class III.  

Class I devices are considered to be of low risk, Class II devices as medium risk and Class III devices as high risk. 

Depending on the classification of device determines the regulatory conformity pathway that needs to be taken to gain compliance and allow manufacturers to place product on the UK market. 

Read More »
March 7, 2022 12:03 pm

A guide to ISO 13485

Implementing quality management system (QMS) iso 13485 couldn’t be easier with our step by step guide. A quality management system is necessary in medical compliance.

Read More »
January 3, 2020 9:57 am

Our Serivces

Our Medical Device and IVD Regulatory & Quality Assurance Services
Click Here

Our latest YouTube videos

ISO 14971 and the Risk Management of Medical Devices plays an integral part of demonstrating product safety throughout the life cycle of medical devices. In fact, the focus of all global medical device regulations relate to risk and how these are mitigated, to demonstrate that the clinical benefit of using the medical device outweighs the risks associated with using the medical device. ISO 14971 is an international standard, a set of ‘state of the art’ and best practice principles adopted by medical device manufacturers. The standard sets out how risks should be identified, assessed for severity and likelihood of occurrence, applying control measures, re-assessment of the risk once control measures are in place, evaluation of residual risks introduced by control measures. It provides a framework to follow to assess risk at each stage of the product life cycle: * Design * Manufacturing * Packaging * Transport * Storage * Use * Obsolescence/disposal The standard is a harmonised/consensus standard. This means that it should be used to demonstrate medical device compliance for the aspects of risk management in accordance with medical device regulations. This includes EU MDR 2017/745, EU IVDR 2017/746, UK MDR 2002 and FDA CFR 21. The first aspect to consider when implementing ISO 14971 is planning. A risk management plan should be developed to demonstrate how risk management will take place. This should be a set of instructions detailing in what form risk management activities will be conducted, the type of risk management principles that will be applied (FMEA for example). It should set out the criteria for what constitutes an acceptable risk compared to an unacceptable risk, and what the actions are based on the risk acceptability criteria. The risk management plan should include the stages at which risk management should take place, and who should be involved in risk management activities. It should also include when and how risk management should take place in relation to post market surveillance and vigilance activities, such as if there was an adverse incident relating to the use of the medical device, that was not foreseen when originally assessing the risks of the medical device. The aim of the plan is to ensure that medical device manufacturers reduce risks to as low as possible. Risk management is an ongoing process and documentation continually kept up to date within the risk management file. Each medical device type should have its own risk management documentation, this is usually kept with the technical documentation in the medical device file. Manufacturers of medical devices are responsible for identifying all the known and foreseeable risks associated with the use of the medical device both within its intended use and misuse of the medical device, the risks should be assessed in both normal and fault conditions. Once risks have been identified they should be assessed based on their severity and likelihood of occurrence. They should also be assessed for acceptability based on the level of risk identified. One way this can be done is through FMEA. Severity is given a number of 1 to 5, with 1 being the lowest risk and 5 being the highest risk and the same for likelihood of occurrence. Its important to remember that the severity of the identified risk will always be the same even after control measures have been put in place, but the likelihood of risk can be moved to a lower number once mitigated and controlled. Once risk control and mitigation factors have been put in place, the manufacturer should assemble the risk management team to evaluate the risk control measures to ensure that the risk has been reduced to as low as possible. They should also evaluate any residual risks that remain after the control measures have been put in place by performing the risk analysis of the control measure against the original risk identified. If the control measures do not mitigate the risk to an acceptable level, then they should take action such as redesign, changes in manufacturing and so on, and then assess the risk again. Once the device is in its final finished form ready for release. The Risk Management Team should evaluate the over all risk documentation that has been generated and evaluate if the residual risks are acceptable and that all residual risk information where a risk is still possible is documented either on the medical device labelling in the form of symbols following ISO 15223-1, and in the instructions for use, providing the end user with important information on how to use the device safely. #riskmanagement #iso14971 #medicaldeviceregulation #medicaldevices #medicalinnovation #medicaltechnology #medicaldevicecompliance www.patientguard.com
ISO 14971 and the risk management of medical devices
IEC 62366-1 is a standard related to usability engineering for medical devices. It provides guidance on how to apply human factors engineering to the design and evaluation of medical devices to ensure their usability and safety. Here's an overview of the key points covered in IEC 62366-1: 1. **Scope**: The standard applies to the process of designing, evaluating, and improving the usability of medical devices to minimize the risks associated with their use. 2. **Definitions**: It provides definitions for various terms used in the context of usability engineering, such as usability, user interface, and user error. 3. **Usability Engineering Process**: IEC 62366-1 outlines a systematic process for integrating human factors engineering principles into the design and development of medical devices. This process includes the following key steps: - Planning usability activities - Conducting a preliminary analysis of use-related hazards - Establishing user requirements - Designing user interfaces - Conducting formative evaluation (testing during the design process) - Conducting summative evaluation (testing after the design process) - Evaluating residual risks - Documenting the usability engineering process 4. **User Interface Design**: The standard emphasizes the importance of designing user interfaces that are intuitive, easy to learn, and efficient to use. It provides guidance on factors such as control labeling, layout, and feedback mechanisms. 5. **Usability Testing**: IEC 62366-1 encourages the use of both formative and summative usability testing to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of medical device user interfaces. It provides guidance on conducting these tests, including selecting appropriate test participants and scenarios. 6. **Risk Management**: The standard integrates usability engineering into the overall risk management process for medical devices. It emphasizes the importance of identifying and mitigating use-related hazards through usability activities. 7. **Documentation Requirements**: IEC 62366-1 specifies the documentation that should be maintained throughout the usability engineering process, including records of user research, design iterations, and usability test results. Overall, IEC 62366-1 serves as a valuable resource for medical device manufacturers seeking to improve the usability and safety of their products through human factors engineering principles. Compliance with this standard can help ensure that medical devices meet the needs of users and minimize the risk of user errors. #medicaldeviceregulation #medicaldevices #medicalinnovation #euregulations #medtech #medicaldevicecompliance #medicaltechnology #healthtech https://patientguard.com
IEC 62366 1 Usability Engineering for Medical Devices
Sterilization of medical devices is a critical process aimed at eliminating or destroying all forms of microbial life, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and spores, from the surface or material of the device. This is essential to prevent infection and ensure the safety of patients undergoing medical procedures. There are several methods commonly used for sterilizing medical devices: 1. **Steam Sterilization (Autoclaving)**: This method utilizes high-pressure steam to achieve sterilization. It is one of the most commonly used and effective methods for heat-resistant medical devices. Autoclaves are machines designed to create the necessary conditions of high temperature (usually around 121-134°C) and pressure to kill microorganisms. 2. **Ethylene Oxide (ETO) Sterilization**: Ethylene oxide gas is a highly effective method for sterilizing heat-sensitive medical devices, such as plastic or electronic components, that cannot withstand the high temperatures of steam sterilization. ETO penetrates packaging and kills microorganisms through alkylation of proteins and nucleic acids. However, ETO requires careful handling due to its toxicity, flammability, and potential residual hazards. 3. **Gamma Radiation Sterilization**: Gamma radiation, emitted from a radioactive isotope such as cobalt-60 or cesium-137, is used to sterilize medical devices. This method disrupts the DNA of microorganisms, preventing them from reproducing. Gamma radiation can penetrate packaging materials, making it suitable for sterilizing pre-packaged devices. However, it may degrade certain materials and can be costly to implement. 4. **Electron Beam (E-beam) Sterilization**: Similar to gamma radiation, electron beam sterilization uses a beam of high-energy electrons to disrupt microbial DNA. It is effective for sterilizing both packaged and unpackaged medical devices and is suitable for heat-sensitive materials. However, like gamma radiation, it can cause material degradation and requires specialized equipment. 5. **Dry Heat Sterilization**: Dry heat sterilization involves exposing medical devices to high temperatures (usually around 160-180°C) for an extended period. This method is effective for heat-stable materials but may take longer than steam sterilization. Dry heat penetrates materials more slowly than moist heat, and it may not be suitable for some types of medical devices. 6. **Chemical Sterilization**: Various chemical agents, such as hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, and chlorine dioxide, can be used for sterilization. These methods are often used for sterilizing endoscopes and other heat-sensitive medical devices. Chemical sterilants work by denaturing proteins and disrupting microbial cell membranes. Care must be taken to ensure thorough rinsing to remove residual chemicals. Each sterilization method has its advantages and limitations, and the choice depends on factors such as the type of medical device, material compatibility, efficacy requirements, and regulatory considerations. Validation studies are necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of the chosen sterilization process for a particular medical device. #sterilization #medicaldeviceregulation #medicaldevices #euregulations #healthcare #medtech https://patientguard.com
The sterilisation of medical devices and the methods used
Medical device labeling is a critical aspect of ensuring patient safety, regulatory compliance, and effective communication between healthcare professionals, patients, and manufacturers. Proper labeling provides essential information about the device, including its intended use, instructions for use, potential risks, and other important details. One standard widely used in medical device labeling is ISO 15223-1. ISO 15223-1, titled "Medical devices - Symbols to be used with medical device labels, labeling, and information to be supplied," is an international standard developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It provides guidelines for the use of symbols on medical device labels, packaging, and accompanying documentation to convey information consistently and universally. Here are some key aspects of ISO 15223-1 and its importance in medical device labeling: 1. **Standardization of Symbols**: ISO 15223-1 standardizes the symbols used on medical device labels to ensure clarity and consistency across different devices and manufacturers. This standardization helps prevent confusion and enhances understanding among users, regardless of their language or cultural background. 2. **Compliance with Regulatory Requirements**: Many regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Union's CE marking system, require medical device manufacturers to use symbols in accordance with ISO 15223-1. Adhering to this standard helps manufacturers demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements, streamlining the approval process for their devices. 3. **Enhanced Communication**: Medical devices often need to convey complex information in a concise and easily understandable manner. ISO 15223-1 provides a set of internationally recognized symbols that can effectively communicate essential information such as warnings, instructions for use, and device characteristics. This enhances communication between manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and end-users, reducing the risk of errors or misuse. 4. **Facilitation of Global Trade**: With medical devices being manufactured and distributed globally, standardizing labeling requirements is crucial for facilitating trade and ensuring product accessibility across different markets. ISO 15223-1 helps harmonize labeling practices, making it easier for manufacturers to navigate international regulatory frameworks and expand their market reach. 5. **Continuous Improvement**: ISO standards are periodically reviewed and updated to reflect advances in technology, changes in regulatory requirements, and feedback from stakeholders. Medical device manufacturers are encouraged to stay updated with the latest revisions of ISO 15223-1 to ensure their labeling practices remain compliant and reflect best practices in the industry. In conclusion, ISO 15223-1 plays a vital role in medical device labeling by standardizing the use of symbols to convey essential information effectively and consistently. Compliance with this standard not only facilitates regulatory approval but also enhances communication, patient safety, and global market access for medical devices. #medicaldeviceregulation #medicaldevices #medicaldevicecompliance #labelling #medtech www.patientguard.com
Medical Device Labelling - ISO 15223 Medical Symbols
Medical device electrical safety is paramount in the healthcare industry, ensuring the protection of patients, healthcare professionals, and the general public from potential hazards associated with electrical devices used in medical settings. From diagnostic equipment to life-saving devices, electrical safety standards are rigorously enforced to minimize risks and ensure optimal performance. Here's a comprehensive overview of the key aspects: ### Importance of Electrical Safety in Medical Devices: 1. **Patient Safety**: Medical devices are often directly connected to patients or used in close proximity to them. Any malfunction or electrical hazard could pose serious risks to patient safety, including electric shock, burns, or interference with bodily functions. 2. **Reliability**: Reliable electrical systems in medical devices are essential for accurate diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients. Malfunctions due to electrical issues can lead to incorrect readings or ineffective treatment, compromising patient care. 3. **Regulatory Compliance**: Regulatory bodies such as the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the United States and the CE (Conformité Européenne) mark in Europe impose stringent electrical safety standards for medical devices. Compliance with these standards is not only mandatory but also ensures the devices meet minimum safety requirements. ### Key Aspects of Medical Device Electrical Safety: 1. **Design and Engineering**: Medical device manufacturers must adhere to specific design and engineering principles to ensure electrical safety. This includes using appropriate materials, insulation, and circuitry to prevent electrical hazards. 2. **Electrical Standards and Regulations**: Medical devices must comply with relevant electrical safety standards and regulations, such as IEC 60601-1 (International Electrotechnical Commission) and ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1 (American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation). These standards outline requirements for insulation, grounding, leakage currents, and more. 3. **Risk Assessment**: Manufacturers conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential electrical hazards associated with their devices. This includes analyzing possible failure modes, conducting fault simulations, and implementing mitigation strategies to minimize risks. 4. **Testing and Certification**: Medical devices undergo rigorous testing procedures to evaluate their electrical safety performance. This includes insulation resistance testing, leakage current measurements, dielectric strength testing, and ground continuity checks. Certification by accredited testing laboratories is necessary to demonstrate compliance with electrical safety standards. 5. **Maintenance and Inspection**: Regular maintenance and inspection of medical devices are essential to ensure continued electrical safety. This includes routine checks for damaged cables, worn insulation, and loose connections, as well as calibration of electrical components to maintain accuracy. 6. **User Training and Education**: Healthcare professionals must receive adequate training on the safe use and handling of medical devices, including understanding electrical safety precautions and protocols. This reduces the risk of accidents or errors caused by improper device operation. ### Challenges in Medical Device Electrical Safety: 1. **Technological Complexity**: Advancements in medical device technology introduce new challenges in ensuring electrical safety, especially with the integration of wireless communication, complex electronics, and connectivity features. 2. **Global Harmonization**: Harmonizing electrical safety standards across different regions and countries can be challenging due to varying regulatory requirements and interpretations. Manufacturers must navigate this complexity to ensure their devices can be marketed internationally. 3. **Emerging Risks**: With the rise of interconnected healthcare systems and IoT (Internet of Things) devices, there's an increased risk of cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities that can impact electrical safety. Manufacturers must address these risks through robust cybersecurity measures. In conclusion, medical device electrical safety is a multifaceted aspect of healthcare technology that requires careful attention throughout the device lifecycle, from design and manufacturing to usage and maintenance. By adhering to stringent standards, conducting thorough risk assessments, and prioritizing user training, manufacturers can ensure the highest levels of electrical safety in medical devices, ultimately safeguarding patient well-being and healthcare outcomes. #medicaldevices #medicaldeviceregulation #medicalinnovation #medtech www.patintguard.com
The Electrical Safety of Medical Devices
To demonstrate that medical devices are safe, and their performance is ‘state of the art’ in line with their clinical intended use, medical device manufacturers must perform clinical evaluation. Clinical evaluation is a requirement of the Medical Device Regulation 2027/745 in the European Union and the UK medical device regulations 2002 in the United Kingdom. Clinical Evaluation forms part of the regulatory requirements that must be met before a manufacturer can apply the CE mark in the EU and the UKCA mark in the UK to their medical devices, and then place them on those markets. Clinical evaluation is a review of all the evidence that has been generated by the manufacturer, from verification and validation activities in the design and development phase and manufacturing phases, including, validation against harmonised standards used to demonstrate conformity, biological evaluation, software validation, sterility validation and so on, relevant to the medical device. It also encompasses a review of any clinical data pertinent to the medical device in the form of published clinical data on the device itself or on similar devices on the market, that can be used to indicate a devices performance and safety. It also reviews any non-published clinical studies or data generated by the manufacturer and assesses the risk management documentation generated by the manufacturer as well as the information provided to the user by the manufacturer, such as, instructions for use and labelling. The purpose of the clinical evaluation is to assess the device to see if the sum of the data generated to demonstrate safety and performance outweigh the risks of using the medical device. Clinical Evaluation is a continual process, for the lifetime of the medical device. The first stage of clinical evaluation is the clinical evaluation plan. The clinical evaluation plan establishes how a manufacturer will perform clinical evaluation. This includes how any scientific literature searches will take place and the methodology and research methods adopted to ensure that clinical data is being searched for follows a valid scientific method. The plan will set out the scope of the clinical evaluation and determine what type of data will be used to perform clinical evaluation. It will identify the relevant regulatory requirements that are applicable to the device in demonstrating performance and safety. Once the plan has been executed, the manufacturer must gather all the relevant pre-clinical data needed to support the clinical evaluation, clinical literature searches should take place using relevant clinical publication sources such as PUBMED and the Cochrane Library, or device/clinical area specific journals, or the unpublished results of clinical trials/studies that have been conducted on the medical device being evaluated. Medical device clinical evaluation should be carried out by suitably qualified experts on the subject device, this usually consists of a multidisciplinary team of experts with clinical knowledge, medical device specific knowledge from the design and manufacturing team, risk management team and regulatory and quality experts. Once all the data has been assessed and critically reviewed it should be presented in the form of a clinical evaluation report. The report should be a critical analysis of all the supporting pre-clinical and clinical data generated to support that the benefit of using the medical device out weighs the risks of using the medical device when considering its intended use. All medical device regardless of their classification must undergo clinical evaluation. For medical devices that are completely novel or legacy devices are being used within a new intended use for which there is no clinical history, it is usually expected that these devices undergo clinical trials to generate supporting clinical evidence that the intended use meets the state of the art. Once a device has been placed on the market, medical device manufactures need to update their Clinical Evaluation on an ongoing basis. This encompasses any new data that has been generated since the last clinical evaluation. Clinical Evaluation is expected to be performed at least on a 2 yearly basis or depending on the level of risk associated with the medical device. Data generated from Post Market Surveillance reports or Periodic Summary Reports should be included in the updated review, and information from Post Market Clinical Follow-up Reports. We hope you enjoyed this video. Please subscribe to our channel to keep up to date with the latest medical device and IVD related content. #medicalinnovation #medtech #medicaldeviceregulation #medicaldevices #euregulations #healthtech #medical www.patientguard.com
Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices
We are on the cusp of a medical revolution, as important as (or perhaps even more than) the discovery of penicillin. With the advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and the exponential increase in chip processing power, AI, has the power to revolutionise healthcare. AI is already being used in many healthcare medical devices, Diabetic Retinopathy Screening being just one. The systems have the power to personalise treatment and diagnose or prognose conditions years before they occur. In this video we will look at AI in medical devices and how regulation will need to be modified in order to keep control and monitor performance of AI technology within the medical device sector. #medicaldeviceregulation #medicalinnovation #healthcarecompliance #medicalinnovation www.patientguard.com
Regulating AI (Artificial Intelligence) Medical Devices
Are you grappling with the complexities of the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746? Identifying whether your product qualifies as an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) device under this regulation is crucial for compliance in the European market. In this insightful video, we unravel the intricacies of IVDR 2017/746 and provide practical guidance on how to ascertain if your product falls within the scope of IVD regulation. Join us as we explore the nuances of IVDR 2017/746, discussing key factors such as intended purpose, specimen type, and risk classification. Whether you're a manufacturer, importer, or distributor of IVD devices, this video equips you with the knowledge necessary to navigate regulatory requirements effectively. Stay ahead of the curve and ensure compliance with IVDR 2017/746. Watch our video now and empower your business with the insights needed to thrive in the ever-changing landscape of medical device regulation. Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more updates on regulatory compliance, industry trends, and best practices for success in the IVD market. #IVDR #IVD #MedicalDevices #RegulatoryCompliance #EURegulations #Healthcare #MedicalTechnology #IVDClassification #MedicalDeviceRegulation #IVDR2017 #MedicalDeviceCompliance
Identifying if a product is an IVD under EU IVDR 2017/746
Are you uncertain about whether your product falls under the classification of a medical device in the European Union? Understanding the regulatory landscape can be daunting, but fear not – our comprehensive guide is here to help! In this enlightening YouTube video, we delve into the intricate world of EU regulations to answer the burning question: Is my product considered a medical device? Whether you're a seasoned entrepreneur or a newcomer to the market, grasping the nuances of medical device classification is essential for compliance and market access. Join us as we break down the criteria set forth by the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) to determine if your product fits the bill. From definitions and examples to practical insights, we'll provide clarity on the factors that influence classification decisions. Our expert analysis will equip you with the knowledge needed to navigate the regulatory maze confidently. Whether you're developing innovative healthcare technologies, diagnostic tools, or therapeutic devices, understanding the regulatory framework is paramount to ensuring safety, efficacy, and market success. Don't let uncertainty hold you back – empower yourself with the information you need to make informed decisions about your product's regulatory status in the EU. Tune in to our video and embark on the journey to compliance and market readiness today! #EUregulations #MedicalDeviceClassification #EuropeanUnion #Compliance #MarketAccess #EUMedicalDeviceRegulation #RegulatoryLandscape #HealthcareTechnologies #DiagnosticTools #TherapeuticDevices #Safety #Efficacy #MarketSuccess #RegulatoryFramework #ProductClassification www.patientguard.com
Navigating EU Regulations: Is My Product a Medical Device?
Load More... Subscribe

Get In touch

Leave us a message

All white version of the Patient Guard Logo - Logo says "Patient Guard Medical Device Regulatory and Quality Assurance"
At Patient Guard we aim to provide our clients with the best regulatory affairs and quality assurance services in the medical device industry.
Linkedin Youtube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Copyright © 2024 Patient Guard

Quick Links
Contact Info
UK Office
German Office
Logo showing that Patient Guard is a member of Medilink. The image has a large letter M in the colour orange, with the word medilink in the colour grey underneath the M and then the word member in the colour orange underneath the word medilink.
Logo showing that Patient Guard is a member of BIVDA. The image is a circle shape with BIVDA written across the middle. The logo is dark blue and white.
The image shows that Patient Guard is a member of ABHI. The logo of ABHI is red with the word member underneath the ABHI.

Do you need support with Medical Device or IVD compliance?

We can help you!