Regulatory Affairs & Compliance Glossary

Navigating the complex landscape of UK and EU regulations requires a clear understanding of the industry’s specialized language. This comprehensive regulatory glossary provides clear definitions for essential acronyms and terms across the Medical Device (MDR), In Vitro Diagnostic (IVDR), Cosmetic, and PPE sectors. Whether you are preparing a technical file or staying compliant with the MHRA and EMA, use this resource as your go-to reference for regulatory clarity

500+ Manufacturers Supported
BSI ISO 13485 Certified
UK & EU Offices
Former MHRA Expertise
Established 2017
Patient Guard medical device regulatory consultancy illustration showing UKCA, CE MDR, FDA, ISO 13485, IVDR and technical documentation.

Compliance Glossary

Author

David Small - Patient Guard - CEO and Founder
This glossary is maintained and periodically reviewed by David to ensure all definitions align with the latest MDCG guidance and legislative updates. His expertise spans across Quality Management Systems (ISO 13485), UKCA marking, and FDA submissions. David founded Patient Guard to provide clear, pragmatic, and accessible regulatory support to medical device companies, ensuring life-saving technologies reach the market safely and efficiently.

Glossary

Updated 7th May 2026

Medical Devices & MDR

AR — Authorised RepresentativeEntity acting for a non-EU manufacturer.
CA — Competent AuthorityNational body responsible for enforcing regulations (e.g. MHRA).
CAB — Conformity Assessment BodyBody that performs calibration, testing, and certification.
CAPA — Corrective and Preventive ActionSystem to investigate and solve product/process non-conformities.
CAR — Corrective Action RequestFormal request to address a specific non-compliance.
CFS — Certificate of Free SaleEvidence that goods are normally sold in the exporting country.
CoC — Certificate of ConformityStatement that a product meets required standards.
DHF — Design History FileA compilation of records which describes the design history of a finished device.
DHR — Device History RecordA compilation of records containing the production history of a finished device.
DMR — Device Master RecordA compilation of records containing the procedures and specifications for a finished device.
DoC — Declaration of ConformityManufacturer's declaration that the product meets EU requirements.
EC REP — EU Authorised RepresentativeLegal representative in the EU for foreign manufacturers.
EEA — European Economic AreaEU member states plus Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.
eIFU — Electronic Instructions for UseInstructions provided in non-paper format.
EU — European UnionPolitical and economic union of 27 member states.
EUDAMED — European Database on Medical DevicesCentralized EU regulatory database.
FSCA — Field Safety Corrective ActionAction taken to reduce risk of health deterioration in the field.
FSN — Field Safety NoticeA manual safety notice delivered to customers regarding an FSCA.
GSPR — General Safety and Performance RequirementsAnnex I requirements for device safety and performance under EU MDR.
IFU — Instructions for UseUser manual/instructions for safe device use.
IFUe — Electronic Instructions for UseInstructions provided in non-paper format (alternative abbreviation).
IMDRF — Intl. Medical Device Regulators ForumGlobal harmonization group for regulators.
MDCG — Medical Device Coordination GroupExpert group issuing guidance for MDR/IVDR.
MEDDEV — Medical Device Guidance DocumentEuropean consensus guidance papers written prior to the MDR.
MDR — Medical Device RegulationEU Regulation 2017/745.
MHRA — Medicines & Healthcare Regulatory AgencyThe UK medical regulatory body.
MIR — Manufacturer Incident ReportForm used to report adverse incidents to authorities.
NB — Notified BodyOrganization designated to assess product conformity.
NCA — National Competent AuthorityMember state's regulatory oversight body.
OBL — Own Brand LabellerCompany placing their brand on another's manufactured device.
OEM — Original Equipment ManufacturerThe actual producer of the device or component.
PMS — Post-Market SurveillanceMonitoring device safety after market placement.
PRRC — Person Resp. for Regulatory ComplianceMandatory regulatory role under MDR.
QMS — Quality Management SystemStructure for ensuring quality (e.g., ISO 13485).
REACH — Registration, Eval. & Auth. of ChemicalsEU regulation on chemical safety.
RoHS — Restr. of Hazardous SubstancesRestricts specific hazardous materials in electronics.
SOP — Standard Operating ProcedureStep-by-step instructions for routine operations.
SRN — Single Registration NumberUnique registration ID in EUDAMED for economic operators.
STED — Summary Technical DocumentationStandardized format for technical files.
SUD — Single-Use DeviceDevice intended for one use on one patient.
TD — Technical DocumentationComplete file proving device compliance.
UDI — Unique Device IdentifierTraceability code identifying a device on the market.
UDI-DI — Unique Device Identifier – Device IdentifierStatic part of the UDI identifying the manufacturer and model.
UDI-PI — Unique Device Identifier – Production IdentifierDynamic part of the UDI identifying production specific variables like batch or lot.
UKRP — UK Responsible PersonLegal representative for non-UK manufacturers in Great Britain.

Clinical, Risk & Usability

AE — Adverse EventUntoward medical occurrence in a subject, user or other person during a clinical study.
B/R — Benefit-RiskAnalysis of potential gains vs potential risks.
CEP — Clinical Evaluation PlanStrategic plan for gathering clinical evidence.
CER — Clinical Evaluation ReportDocumenting clinical safety and performance.
CIP — Clinical Investigation PlanProtocol for a clinical study.
CRA — Clinical Research AssociateTrial monitor ensuring protocol adherence.
CRF / eCRF — (Electronic) Case Report FormData collection tool for trial participants.
CRO — Clinical Research OrganisationOutsourced clinical trial management and support service provider.
FMEA — Failure Modes & Effects AnalysisRisk tool to identify potential failure points.
GCP — Good Clinical PracticeInternational ethical and quality standard for trials.
GHTF — Global Harmonization Task ForceThe predecessor group to the IMDRF focused on global alignment.
HFE — Human Factors EngineeringDesigning for safe and intuitive human use.
IB — Investigator’s BrochureCompilation of clinical and non-clinical data for investigators.
ICF — Informed Consent FormDocumenting a participant's voluntary trial entry.
PICO — Population, Intervention, Comparator, OutcomeA structured framework used to formulate clinical literature search criteria.
PI — Principal InvestigatorPerson responsible for trial conduct at a site.
PMCF — Post-Market Clinical Follow-upContinuous clinical data collection after launch.
PSUR — Periodic Safety Update ReportScheduled safety summary for higher-risk devices.
RMF — Risk Management FileRepository for all risk assessment and planning records.
SAE — Serious Adverse EventAdverse event resulting in death, serious injury, or medical intervention.
SOTA — State of the ArtCurrently accepted high-standard technical/clinical practice in industry.
SSCP — Summary of Safety and Clinical PerformancePublic document intended for patients and users explaining clinical data.
SUSAR — Suspected Unexpected Serious Adv. ReactionUnexpected serious trial event.
UI / UX — User Interface / User ExperienceDesign and interaction points for the user.
URS — User Requirement SpecificationList of critical needs for a device or software.

Software & Cybersecurity

AI — Artificial IntelligenceSimulation of human intelligence workflows by computer networks.
AI / ML — Artificial Intelligence / Machine LearningSystems capable of performing intelligence-based tasks.
ALM — Application Lifecycle ManagementGovernance of software from inception to retirement.
CSV — Computer System ValidationProving a computerized system works as intended.
CVE — Common Vulnerabilities and ExposuresPublic list of cybersecurity flaws.
MFA — Multi-Factor AuthenticationSecurity process requiring multiple verification methods.
ML — Machine LearningSub-discipline of AI developing algorithmic pattern analysis networks.
PHI — Protected Health InformationSensitive patient data protected by law.
SaMD — Software as a Medical DeviceSoftware running stand-alone with medical intent without integration into hardware.
SBOM — Software Bill of MaterialsInventory of all software components.
SDLC — Software Development Life CycleThe process for building and testing software.
SOUP — Software of Unknown ProvenanceThird-party software lacking a documented SDLC.
VPN — Virtual Private NetworkEncrypted connection over a less secure network.

Sterilisation & Validation

BI — Biological IndicatorLiving test systems to verify sterilization effectiveness.
EO / ETO — Ethylene OxideChemical gas used for sterilization.
IQ/OQ/PQ — Validation StagesInstallation, Operational, and Performance Qualification.
SAL — Sterility Assurance LevelProbability of survival after sterilization.
VHP — Vaporised Hydrogen PeroxideLow-temp antimicrobial vapor for sterilization.

In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs)

IVDR — IVD RegulationEU Regulation 2017/746.
LDT — Laboratory Developed TestTest designed and used within a single laboratory.
PEP / PER — Performance Eval. Plan / ReportStrategy and evidence report for IVD performance.
PMPF — Post-Market Performance Follow-upContinuous collection of clinical performance and safety data for an IVD device after market placement.
RUO — Research Use OnlyProduct not intended for clinical diagnostic use.

FDA & International

510(k) — Premarket NotificationSubmission proving substantial equivalence in the US.
CFR — Code of Federal RegulationsThe US federal regulatory rules.
EUA — Emergency Use AuthorizationExpedited authorization mechanism used by the FDA during public health emergencies.
FDA — Food & Drug AdministrationThe US medical and food regulator.
Form 483 — Inspectional ObservationsIssues observed during an FDA site inspection.
MDSAP — Medical Device Single Audit ProgramSingle audit program for multiple countries.
PMA — Premarket ApprovalFDA scientific and regulatory evaluation process for Class III devices.
QSR — Quality System RegulationUS manufacturing requirements (21 CFR 820).
TGA — Therapeutic Goods AdministrationThe Australian medical regulator.

Quality & Manufacturing

BOM — Bill of MaterialsComprehensive list of parts for manufacturing.
CMO — Contract Manufacturing OrganisationCompany that manufacturers products under contract.
ERP — Enterprise Resource PlanningSoftware for managing business processes.
GMP — Good Manufacturing PracticeQuality standards for consistent production.
KPI — Key Performance IndicatorQuantifiable measure of performance over time.
NC / NCR — Non-Conformance (Report)Documenting when a product doesn't meet requirements.
QA / QC — Quality Assurance / ControlFocus on process and product safety.
RCA — Root Cause AnalysisMethod for identifying the core cause of a problem.

Biocompatibility & Safety

BEP / BER — Biological Eval. Plan / ReportStrategy and findings for biocompatibility.
CMR — Carcinogenic, Mutagenic or ReprotoxicSubstances hazardous to health.

Cosmetics

CPNP — Cosmetic Product Notification PortalThe EU portal for cosmetic registration.
CPSR — Cosmetic Product Safety ReportMandatory safety assessment for cosmetics.
PIF — Product Information FileTechnical dossier for cosmetic products.

Environmental

ESG — Environmental, Social & GovernanceStandards for a company's operations regarding the planet and society.
WEEE — Waste Electrical & Electronic EquipmentDirective for the collection and recycling of electronics.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

The EU MDR (Medical Device Regulation 2017/745) applies to general medical devices, ranging from bandages to pacemakers.

 

The IVDR (In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation 2017/746) specifically governs devices used to test biological samples outside the human body, such as blood tests or COVID-19 kits. Both regulations focus on increasing safety and transparency across the product lifecycle.

If a medical device manufacturer is based outside of the United Kingdom, they must appoint a UK Responsible Person (UKRP) to place their products on the Great Britain market. The UKRP acts as the primary liaison with the MHRA and ensures that the manufacturer has met all technical documentation and registration requirements.

Devices are classified based on their intended use and inherent risk. Class I (low risk) includes items like stethoscopes; Class IIa and IIb (medium risk) include items like dental fillings or infusion pumps; and Class III (high risk) includes life-sustaining devices like heart valves. Higher classifications require more rigorous clinical data and Notified Body oversight.

Under MDR and IVDR, manufacturers must have at least one PRRC within their organization. This individual is legally responsible for ensuring the company complies with manufacturing quality, technical documentation, and post-market surveillance obligations.

A CER is a living document. For high-risk or Class III devices, it typically must be updated annually. For lower-risk devices, it may be updated every 2 to 5 years, or whenever new Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) data significantly changes the benefit-risk profile of the device.

A Notified Body is an independent third-party organization designated by an EU Member State to assess whether a product meets the essential requirements of the MDR or IVDR. They perform audits of the Quality Management System (QMS) and technical files before a CE certificate can be issued.

Posted on Google Google
Nafiul Shelim profile picture
Nafiul Shelim
2 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I worked with Eleanor Shackleton, from Patient Guard, for the purpose of MDR, CE and UKCA marking. Her diligence, and knowledge in clinical and regulatory requirements for medical device software was critical for us. Would highly recommend
Posted on Google Google
Jay Verma profile picture
Jay Verma
27 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I found Patient Guard Ltd to be an exceptional partner. Their assessment was thorough, their guidance clear, and their support instrumental in helping us achieve our objectives. Steve and Ellie, in particular, were outstanding in steering us through the MHRA Class I medical device registration process.
Posted on Google Google
Munna P profile picture
Munna P
80 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Working with the Patient Guard team has been a great experience throughout our MHRA and ISO 13485 documentation journey. Their expertise, structured approach, and practical guidance helped our team build a robust quality management system while keeping us aligned with regulatory expectations. The collaboration was professional, responsive, and focused on finding solutions rather than simply identifying issues. A special thank you to Alex and Steve for their outstanding coordination, responsiveness, and continuous support throughout the project. They were always approachable, provided valuable feedback, and worked closely with our team to resolve challenges efficiently. Their commitment made a significant difference in keeping our documentation effort on track. I highly recommend Patient Guard to any healthcare or MedTech organization looking for experienced regulatory and quality system partners for MHRA, ISO 13485, and broader medical device compliance initiatives. Thank you again to the entire Patient Guard team for being such reliable partners.
Posted on Google Google
Peter Reeve profile picture
Peter Reeve
107 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
STEPPER design, manufacture & distribute eyewear across the globe. With the increasingly complex landscape concerning the placing of Mecial Devices onto the market, we realised we needed professional guidance. We found Patient Guard via a simple internet search and are delighted we did! They provide a pragmatic solution to our needs, are totally reliable & always available to answer our (often simplistic) questions. They are highly efficient & responsive to what is a changing picture in our world and nothing is too much trouble. We have a much better understanding of regulatory affairs and our responsibilities as manufacturers & distributors and they support us in navigating the requirements in different territories. Updating our Declaration of Conformity, ensuring our labelling is compliant and acting as our PRRC are the key areas of their service for us.
Posted on Google Google
Derek Timm profile picture
Derek Timm
107 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
For those companıes lookıng to comply to ISO standards and ın partıcular ISO13485 whıch to be honest ıs a nıghtmare I would strongly suggest goıng to the professıonals as ındeed we dıd by joınıng forces wıth Patıent Guard Ltd The staff are fantastıc nothıng ıs too much trouble and as a medıcal supply company we sımply cannot lıve wıthout them Thanks ın partıcular to Alex and Steve for all the hard work and our best regards from Dan Medıca South Lımıted
Posted on Google Google
BMSCriticalCare profile picture
BMSCriticalCare
144 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great service, very helpful and always willing to answer any questions we have,
Posted on Google Google
Thomson Software profile picture
Thomson Software
815 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex Lewis of PatientGuard guided us through the ISO13485 process in a thorough, systematic and efficient manner. He was friendly, patient and willing to go the extra mile. Excellent service.
Posted on Google Google
Hannah Maddison profile picture
Hannah Maddison
918 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Fantastic, knowledgeable team that are always there to help. My appointments have always been booked in very promptly and have always ended with all my queries resolved. I have found the team very flexible and their breadth of knowledge is second to none. Patient Guard are without doubt my go-to for all the regulatory aspects of my medical device role.
Posted on Google Google
Richard Crow profile picture
Richard Crow
953 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Patientguard are an excellent source of Medical regulatory compliance advice, we have taken advantage of their various services from their EU Rep service, to helping with Technical Files all the way through to using their ISO Templates to implement our ISO 13485 system.
Posted on Google Google
George Kitching profile picture
George Kitching
956 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
David Small and PatientGuard have been extremely helpful and supportive in assisting us with producing and updating our Technical File and Appendices for MDR certification.
Verified by Trustindex
Trustindex verified badge is the Universal Symbol of Trust. Only the greatest companies can get the verified badge who has a review score above 4.5, based on customer reviews over the past 12 months. Read more

Get in touch

Our Friendly Team are here to help.

Book a Free Consultation

Speak to one of our regulatory and compliance experts to arrange an obligation-free call. Our experienced team is ready to help you get your medical device to market.

UK Office

Get the Medical Device Technical Checklist

Thank you! The checklist is now ready to download.