IVDR Transitional Provisions: 2026 Milestones

2026 represents a significant milestone for the amended IVDR transitional provisions framework.
IVDR-Transitional-Provisions-2026-Milestones

Updated: 23rd June 2026

Reviewed by: David Small, BSc (Hons), MSc, MTOPRA (Founder and CEO)

IVDR Transitional Framework

The amended IVDR transitional framework does not provide manufacturers with unconditional extensions to the original certification deadlines. Instead, the revised timelines are subject to strict legal conditions that manufacturers must satisfy to remain eligible. The key milestone dates are not planning targets—they are mandatory eligibility requirements. Missing either the application or written agreement deadline may result in the loss of the extended transition period for the affected device.

These changes were introduced through Regulation (EU) 2024/1860, which amended the transitional provisions of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) in response to limited Notified Body capacity and the risk of widespread market disruption. The amended legislation extends the transition period for eligible legacy devices, but only where manufacturers continue to meet defined compliance obligations and achieve the required milestones within the specified deadlines.

This guide explains how the amended IVDR transitional provisions work, the key milestones manufacturers must meet in 2026, particularly for Class C devices, and the practical steps needed to maintain eligibility for continued EU market access.

What are the IVDR transitional provisions?

The IVDR transitional provisions are a legal mechanism that allows certain legacy in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs) to remain on the European Union market while manufacturers transition from compliance with the In Vitro Diagnostic Directive (IVDD) to full certification under the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR).

The legal basis for these provisions is found primarily in Article 110 of Regulation (EU) 2017/746, which permits eligible legacy devices to continue being placed on the market under defined conditions while manufacturers progress through the IVDR conformity assessment process.

Following the introduction of the IVDR, the designation of Notified Bodies progressed more slowly than anticipated, creating significant capacity constraints across the European regulatory system. As a result, many manufacturers faced delays in securing conformity assessments despite actively working towards compliance. To reduce the risk of essential IVDs being withdrawn from the market, the European Union adopted Regulation (EU) 2024/1860, which amended the transitional framework.

The amended legislation extended the transition periods for eligible legacy devices while introducing stricter eligibility requirements. These include:

  • Extended transition end-dates based on device classification.

  • Mandatory application and written agreement milestones with a Notified Body.

  • Ongoing compliance obligations, including maintenance of an IVDR-compliant quality management system and continued fulfilment of applicable regulatory requirements.

It is important to understand that these transitional provisions are conditional, not automatic. They apply only to eligible legacy devices that continue to satisfy all of the legal requirements throughout the transition period. Devices that fail to meet the prescribed milestones or ongoing compliance obligations may lose the benefit of the extended transition and no longer be eligible to remain on the EU market.

What are the IVDR transitional provisions?

The IVDR transitional provisions are conditional legal measures that allow eligible legacy IVDs to continue being placed on the EU market while manufacturers complete the transition to full IVDR certification, provided all applicable milestone deadlines and ongoing compliance requirements are met.

Regulation (EU) 2024/1860 - what it actually changed

There is a persistent myth that the amendment “paused” IVDR obligations. It did not.

What changed:

  • Transition end-dates by device class were extended
  • Formal milestone gates were introduced:
    • Application to a Notified Body by a defined date
    • Signed written agreement by a defined date

What did not change:

  • Ongoing IVDR PMS obligations
  • Vigilance requirements
  • Performance evaluation expectations
  • QMS obligations under Article 10(8)
  • Technical documentation requirements

The transition is conditional, not automatic.

Under the amended framework:

  • Class D transition runs until 31 December 2027
  • Class C until 31 December 2028
  • Class B and Class A sterile until 31 December 2029

But those dates only apply if milestone gates are met.

IVDR milestone deadlines 2026 explained

The heart of the amended IVDR transitional provisions is the milestone structure.

IVDR-Transitional-Provisions-2026-Milestones-1

Milestones by class

 

Device class (legacy devices)

Transition end-date

Application milestone

Written agreement milestone

Class D

31 Dec 2027

26 May 2025

26 Sep 2025

Class C

31 Dec 2028

26 May 2026

26 Sep 2026

Class B / Class A sterile

31 Dec 2029

26 May 2027

26 Sep 2027

2026 - Class C IVDs

Interpretation in one sentence: 2026 is the make-or-break year for Class C portfolios.

26 May 2026 - Application milestone for Class C

The Notified Body application deadline 2026 is not symbolic. It is a formal eligibility checkpoint.

For Class C legacy devices relying on extended transition:

  • An application for IVDR certification must be lodged with a Notified Body by 26 May 2026.
  • It must be sufficiently complete to be accepted into the Notified Body’s process.
  • It cannot be an informal expression of interest.

The European Commission’s Q&A materials emphasise that the milestone is linked to formal submission into the certification process.

When must IVDR application be submitted?
For Class C legacy devices relying on extended transition, by 26 May 2026.

26 September 2026 - Written agreement milestone for Class C

The second gate is the IVDR written agreement requirement.

By 26 September 2026, a signed written agreement with a Notified Body must be in place for Class C devices relying on the extended transition.

No written agreement means no continued eligibility for the extended period.

IVDR written agreement by September 2026?
Yes. For Class C, the agreement must be signed by 26 September 2026.

These two gates define the IVDR milestone deadlines 2026 for Class C.

IVDR Class C transitional deadline - why it matters most

Class C is where volume meets scrutiny.

Many commercially significant IVDs fall into Class C. Under IVDR, Class C devices require Notified Body involvement. They sit in the mid-to-high risk category, which increases evidentiary expectations.

Under the amended IVDR transitional provisions, Class C devices benefit from transition until 31 December 2028. But that benefit is conditional on meeting the 2026 milestones.

This creates a compressed reality:

  • High product volumes
  • Heavy documentation expectations
  • Constrained Notified Body capacity
  • Hard milestone gates in 2026

From a commercial perspective, the IVDR Class C transitional deadline is not just regulatory. It is a market continuity risk. Distributors and importers do not tolerate regulatory uncertainty indefinitely.

Conditions for extended transition under IVDR

The conditions for extended transition IVDR must be treated as a compliance checklist.

To rely on the amended IVDR transitional provisions, manufacturers must ensure:

  • The device qualifies as a legacy device
  • No significant changes are made to design or intended purpose
  • The device continues to comply with the previous Directive
  • The manufacturer meets IVDR PMS obligations during transition
  • The manufacturer meets IVDR Article 10(8) QMS requirements
  • The application and written agreement milestones are met

What happens if IVDR milestones are missed?
The device may lose eligibility for the extended transition period and may no longer be legally placed on the EU market.

Article 10(8) QMS requirements - already in force

Article 10(8) of the IVDR defines manufacturer obligations for establishing and maintaining a compliant quality management system.

This is not a 2026 obligation. It is already applicable.

The extension framework assumes that manufacturers relying on IVDR transitional provisions have a functioning QMS aligned with IVDR expectations.

Core QMS elements include:

  • Risk management
  • Performance evaluation
  • PMS and vigilance
  • Change control
  • Documentation control

Do transitional devices need a QMS?
Yes. Transitional status does not remove QMS obligations.

IVDR Notified Body engagement - the real bottleneck

The law gives you dates. Notified Bodies give you reality.

IVDR-Transitional-Provisions-2026-Milestones

Effective IVDR Notified Body engagement means:

  • Clarifying scope and device classification early
  • Preparing a mature application package
  • Understanding review timelines and resourcing
  • Planning for iterative technical documentation review

Guidance such as MDCG 2021-4 Rev.1 provides insight into transitional mechanics and practicalities around certification and processing:

Under the IVDR certification process, Notified Bodies will scrutinise:

  • Technical documentation structure
  • Performance evaluation robustness
  • PMS systems
  • QMS implementation evidence

A weak application submitted on time does not equal a safe milestone.

Technical documentation and performance expectations

The IVDR technical documentation requirements are set out primarily in Annex II and Annex III of the IVDR.

Annex II covers:

  • Device description
  • Design and manufacturing information
  • General safety and performance requirements mapping
  • Risk management
  • Performance evaluation

Annex III covers PMS documentation.

For Class C, performance evaluation is central. The IVDR performance evaluation requirements include:

  • Scientific validity
  • Analytical performance
  • Clinical performance

Misalignment between intended purpose and performance evidence is a common failure point in the IVDR certification process.

IVDR PMS obligations during transition

Transitional status does not dilute surveillance.

Manufacturers must continue to meet IVDR PMS obligations, including:

  • Maintaining a PMS plan
  • Conducting ongoing surveillance
  • Reporting serious incidents
  • Updating documentation where necessary

Auditors and Notified Bodies look for a visible feedback loop:

PMS data → risk reassessment → performance evaluation updates → documentation updates.

The IVDR compliance timeline does not pause surveillance while you wait for certification.

What happens if 2026 milestones are missed?

If a Class C manufacturer misses:

  • The 26 May 2026 application milestone, or
  • The 26 September 2026 written agreement milestone,

the extended transition to 31 December 2028 may no longer apply.

The practical effect can be the loss of legal market access for the affected devices.

Are IVDR deadlines extended again?
As of the currently published EU position and legislative framework under Regulation (EU) 2024/1860, there are no confirmed further extensions.

IVDR-Transitional-Provisions-2026-Milestones-3

Building an IVDR market access strategy

A credible IVDR market access strategy must treat the IVDR transitional provisions as eligibility gates, not background noise.

Portfolio prioritisation

  • Identify revenue-critical products
  • Identify marginal products that may be retired
  • Sequence certification by commercial impact

Early Notified Body contracting

Work backwards from the IVDR written agreement requirement milestone. For Class C, that means no later than 26 September 2026.

Technical documentation gap assessment

  • Review Annex II and III structure
  • Align performance evaluation
  • Validate traceability and risk documentation

Strengthening QMS to Article 10(8)

Ensure your QMS is demonstrably operational, not template-based.

Performance evaluation and PMS readiness

Treat performance evidence and PMS systems as market access enablers.

Common misconceptions about the 2026 deadlines

  • “Deadlines were extended again.”
    The legally relevant extension is already in place via Regulation (EU) 2024/1860. Eligibility depends on meeting milestone conditions.
  • “Transitional devices don’t need IVDR-level PMS.”
    IVDR PMS obligations remain active.
  • “Application submission alone is enough.”
    You also need the written agreement milestone.
  • “Written agreement can wait until 2027.”
    For Class C, the milestone is 26 September 2026.

Transitional does not mean permanent.

How Patient Guard supports transitional compliance

Patient Guard supports manufacturers through:

  • Transitional eligibility assessments by class and product
  • Notified Body readiness support and application preparation
  • Technical documentation gap analysis aligned to Annex II and III
  • QMS alignment with Article 10(8)
  • Performance evaluation and PMS integration strategy

Conclusion

2026 represents a significant milestone year inside the IVDR transitional provisions framework.
Eligibility for extended transition depends on structured legal conditions, especially the application and written agreement milestones for Class C.


Manufacturers that engage early with their Notified Body, maintain an IVDR-compliant quality management system and prepare robust technical documentation will be significantly better placed to achieve certification and maintain uninterrupted access to the European market.

Frequently Asked Questions About IVDR transitional provisions

They are conditional legal extensions allowing eligible legacy IVDs to remain on the market while transitioning to full IVDR certification.

For Class C legacy devices, 2026 contains the application and written agreement deadlines.

For Class C, the application must be submitted by 26 May 2026.

For Class C, a signed written agreement with a Notified Body must be in place by 26 September 2026.

Yes. QMS obligations remain applicable during transition.

The device may lose eligibility for the extended transitional period and may no longer be legally placed on the EU market.

References

The information presented in this guide has been prepared with reference to the following legislation, standards and official regulatory guidance relating to the IVDR transitional provisions and ongoing compliance requirements.

Organisation Reference Relevance
European Union Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices (IVDR) Primary legislation governing in vitro diagnostic medical devices within the European Union.
European Union Regulation (EU) 2024/1860 Amends the IVDR transitional provisions, extending transition periods and introducing milestone requirements for manufacturers.
European Commission Medical Devices and IVD Guidance Documents Official guidance supporting implementation of the MDR and IVDR.
European Commission MDCG Guidance Documents Official guidance published by the Medical Device Coordination Group to support interpretation and application of the IVDR.
European Commission Notified Bodies for Medical Devices Information on the designation, oversight and role of Notified Bodies in conformity assessment.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ISO 13485:2016 – Medical Devices – Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Regulatory Purposes International standard for quality management systems supporting regulatory compliance for medical device and IVD manufacturers.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ISO 14971:2019 – Medical Devices – Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices International standard describing the application of risk management throughout the medical device lifecycle.

IVDR legislation, transitional provisions, regulatory guidance and recognised standards continue to evolve. Manufacturers should always consult the latest published legislation, standards and official guidance when planning certification activities and maintaining eligibility under the IVDR transitional framework.

David Small BSc (Hons), MSc, MTOPRA

David Small BSc (Hons), MSc, MTOPRA

Reviewed by
David Small, BSc (Hons), MSc, MTOPRA
Founder & CEO |
20+ years in medical device regulatory affairs,  MDR/IVDR compliance and quality systems.

Patient Guards Recent Posts

Cosmetic Product Safety Report (CPSR): A Complete Guide to UK Cosmetic Compliance

Before a cosmetic product can legally be placed on the UK market, manufacturers and Responsible Persons must demonstrate that it is safe for human use under normal or reasonably foreseeable conditions. The Cosmetic Product Safety Report (CPSR) is one of the most important regulatory documents required under the UK Cosmetics Regulation. This guide explains what a CPSR is, who can prepare one, what information it must contain, how it relates to the Product Information File (PIF) and how it supports legal cosmetic compliance.

Read More »

IVDR PMPF Explained: A Complete Guide to Post-Market Performance Follow-up

Post-Market Performance Follow-up (PMPF) is a fundamental requirement under the EU In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR), ensuring that manufacturers continually monitor the scientific validity, analytical performance and clinical performance of their in vitro diagnostic medical devices after CE marking. This guide explains IVDR PMPF requirements, PMPF Plans, PMPF Reports, Annex XIII expectations and how ongoing performance monitoring supports continued regulatory compliance throughout the device lifecycle.

Read More »

Need Training?

Do you need training on Quality Management Systems or EU MDR/ EU IVDR? then check out our training courses.

Share this guide:
Posted on Google Google
Jay Verma profile picture
Jay Verma
1 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I found Patient Guard Ltd to be an exceptional partner. Their assessment was thorough, their guidance clear, and their support instrumental in helping us achieve our objectives. Steve and Ellie, in particular, were outstanding in steering us through the MHRA Class I medical device registration process.
Posted on Google Google
Munna P profile picture
Munna P
54 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Working with the Patient Guard team has been a great experience throughout our MHRA and ISO 13485 documentation journey. Their expertise, structured approach, and practical guidance helped our team build a robust quality management system while keeping us aligned with regulatory expectations. The collaboration was professional, responsive, and focused on finding solutions rather than simply identifying issues. A special thank you to Alex and Steve for their outstanding coordination, responsiveness, and continuous support throughout the project. They were always approachable, provided valuable feedback, and worked closely with our team to resolve challenges efficiently. Their commitment made a significant difference in keeping our documentation effort on track. I highly recommend Patient Guard to any healthcare or MedTech organization looking for experienced regulatory and quality system partners for MHRA, ISO 13485, and broader medical device compliance initiatives. Thank you again to the entire Patient Guard team for being such reliable partners.
Posted on Google Google
Peter Reeve profile picture
Peter Reeve
81 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
STEPPER design, manufacture & distribute eyewear across the globe. With the increasingly complex landscape concerning the placing of Mecial Devices onto the market, we realised we needed professional guidance. We found Patient Guard via a simple internet search and are delighted we did! They provide a pragmatic solution to our needs, are totally reliable & always available to answer our (often simplistic) questions. They are highly efficient & responsive to what is a changing picture in our world and nothing is too much trouble. We have a much better understanding of regulatory affairs and our responsibilities as manufacturers & distributors and they support us in navigating the requirements in different territories. Updating our Declaration of Conformity, ensuring our labelling is compliant and acting as our PRRC are the key areas of their service for us.
Posted on Google Google
Derek Timm profile picture
Derek Timm
81 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
For those companıes lookıng to comply to ISO standards and ın partıcular ISO13485 whıch to be honest ıs a nıghtmare I would strongly suggest goıng to the professıonals as ındeed we dıd by joınıng forces wıth Patıent Guard Ltd The staff are fantastıc nothıng ıs too much trouble and as a medıcal supply company we sımply cannot lıve wıthout them Thanks ın partıcular to Alex and Steve for all the hard work and our best regards from Dan Medıca South Lımıted
Posted on Google Google
BMSCriticalCare profile picture
BMSCriticalCare
118 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great service, very helpful and always willing to answer any questions we have,
Posted on Google Google
Thomson Software profile picture
Thomson Software
789 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Alex Lewis of PatientGuard guided us through the ISO13485 process in a thorough, systematic and efficient manner. He was friendly, patient and willing to go the extra mile. Excellent service.
Verified by Trustindex
Trustindex verified badge is the Universal Symbol of Trust. Only the greatest companies can get the verified badge who has a review score above 4.5, based on customer reviews over the past 12 months. Read more

Most Popular

Cosmetic Product Safety Report (CPSR): A Complete Guide to UK Cosmetic Compliance

Before a cosmetic product can legally be placed on the UK market, manufacturers and Responsible Persons must demonstrate that it is safe for human use under normal or reasonably foreseeable conditions. The Cosmetic Product Safety Report (CPSR) is one of the most important regulatory documents required under the UK Cosmetics Regulation. This guide explains what a CPSR is, who can prepare one, what information it must contain, how it relates to the Product Information File (PIF) and how it supports legal cosmetic compliance.

Read More »

IVDR PMPF Explained: A Complete Guide to Post-Market Performance Follow-up

Post-Market Performance Follow-up (PMPF) is a fundamental requirement under the EU In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR), ensuring that manufacturers continually monitor the scientific validity, analytical performance and clinical performance of their in vitro diagnostic medical devices after CE marking. This guide explains IVDR PMPF requirements, PMPF Plans, PMPF Reports, Annex XIII expectations and how ongoing performance monitoring supports continued regulatory compliance throughout the device lifecycle.

Read More »

IVDR Scientific Validity Explained: A Complete Guide for Manufacturers

Scientific Validity is the first pillar of IVDR Performance Evaluation and provides the scientific foundation demonstrating that an analyte or biomarker is associated with a specific clinical condition or physiological state. This guide explains Scientific Validity under Regulation (EU) 2017/746, including literature reviews, Scientific Validity Reports, Annex XIII requirements, evidence appraisal and how Scientific Validity supports successful CE marking.

Read More »
patient guard
Patient Guard

Sign up to our newsletter

Be the first to hear industry news and how Patient Guard can help you.

Get the latest updates on medical device regulation

Sign up to our newsletter and we’ll deliver news and insights straight to your inbox.

Get the Medical Device Technical Checklist

Thank you! The checklist is now ready to download.